sonipittsMy name is Soni Pitts. I'm a professional copywriter and marketing geek, among other things.
This is my personal blog, a place for me to hang out and discuss whatever interests me, which at this moment seems to be stupid human tricks, weird science, mild geekery, zombies, food, myself and a few other bits and pieces of life.
Read at your own risk. Confronting new ideas without sufficient preparation can be dangerous! The author cannot be held responsible for paradigm shifts, cognitive dissonance, sneaking suspicions, throbbing temple veins, blood pressure spikes and/or fits (epileptic or apoplectic) caused by irresponsible ingestion of the materials presented herein.
About Me
Everything you ever wanted to know about me, and probably more. Also, the house rules and other random tidbits.
My Squidoo Lenses
Soni's Place - All Soni, all the time. Your basic vanity lens.
Write Livelihood - The home base of my freelance writing empire. Such as it is.
The Basics of Article Marketing - A lens on using web articles as a marketing platform.
Blogs
Write Livelihood - A blogfolio of my writing clips and samples.
NEW! Getting Things Done: A Year of Service - A blog I've set up to journal about my Americorps service.
|
 |
Thursday, July 07, 2005
One use for those over-built Jaycee halls
"Just imagine how good it would feel if we all got together once in a while in large public gatherings and admitted that we don't know why we are alive, that nobody knows for sure if there's a higher being who created us, and that nobody really knows what the hell's going on here." -- Wes Nisker, meditation teacher, Inquiring Mind (Spring 2005)
Posted at 12:05 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
Although this article on parking lot pollution of run-off water was written about tests in Austin, the fact is if your town has parking lots, this is happening in (and to) your back yard: A new study by the city of Austin and the U.S. Geological Survey suggests that coal-tar sealant, the shiny black stuff that goes on parking lots to protect asphalt from the elements, may be a major source of water pollution in Austin.
Scientists from the city's Watershed Protection and Development Review Department had been studying PAH hot spots since the late 1990s, but it wasn't until 2001 that they started collaborating with the USGS. The partnership began, Van Metre recalled, when city scientists approached the USGS with sediment from local waterways showing levels of PAH contamination that Van Metre found literally unbelievable.
"Our first reaction was we thought their data were wrong," he said. "We thought there must be a lab problem, the numbers were so high."
Gee - that whole pave-the-world development for progress thing is looking less and less like a run for eternal prosperity and more and more like a set of "let's see how fast we can kill ourselves and everything around us" wind sprints.
Posted at 12:02 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
Extreme environmentalism or common sense tinged with machismo? You decide: In response to a query about the environmental considerations of using disposable razor blades, environmental advice columnist Umbra Fisk responds thusly: Your argument for remaining beard-free is unimpeachable. But you must stop using disposable plastic razors. I don't need to spell out the reasons: the source of plastic, the likely distant country of origin, the effect on the waste stream. Here in the U.S., 2 billion disposable razors are purchased annually. That's a lot of space in the landfill.
Besides the environmental concern, David, there's, well, the dorkiness. You want a date, you want the date to lead to something, and at some point the date might see you shave. Shaving is sexy, and a choice opportunity to impress that special man or woman with your suave masculinity. Plastic disposables say, "I think little about personal grooming" -- not to mention, "I'm cheap" -- and you have little margin for this type of drastic error.
Intrigued? Instructions for more or less safely resurrecting the lost art of straight razor grooming.
Posted at 11:49 am by sonipitts
Permalink |
I was reading Pat O'Bryan's e-newsletter today and he was talking about creating a "treasure map" (where you paste up pictures representative of your dreams as a way to visualize and attract such things).When he got to the section where he was discussing his financial dreams, he mentioned a stunning little mathematical/metaphysical tidbit that I just had to share with you. He wrote about a success-delineation formula he came across that said that your income is the average of the incomes of your 5 closest friends. Shocked, but curious, he did the math - and discovered that it was true. Interesting. Of course, we all tend to hang out with others in similar circumstances - it's just human nature - so of course it's very likely that all of your friends are going to have similar incomes to yourself and so when those incomes are averaged, it will be close to your own. However, on the flip side, it is also fairly common knowledge that we tend to behave upward or downward to the expectations of those around us (we behave far differently around our tailgate-party friends than we do around our dinner-at-the-boss' colleagues). And it's old news that to get better at a sport, you don't play within your point-group - you play with people who can wipe the floor with you on your best days. Ergo, the theory goes, if we take the initiative to hang around people who are richer, more successful, more enlightened, more productive, more whatever it is we want to be, then some of that is bound to rub off as we learn from them and adjust our behaviors and thoughts to harmonize with our surroundings. Of course, not all of us want to be filthy rich and celebrity famous - I, for one, want to be able to go to the store without a bodyguard, thank you very much - do you know how much one of those guys eats? But most of us want to be at least financially independent, personally successful and passionate about what we do and how we live our lives. So take a look around you. Who are you hanging out with? What are their motivations, their habits, their incomes, their outlooks and their ratios of intrinsic vs expressed potential? Does your posse represent the ideal you, or could it be holding you back from who you want to be? Now, I'm not advocating a "ditch your true friends in search of greener pastures elsewhere" scorched earth approach. That's just wrong. But I am advocating a "ditch the loser habit-buddies you hang around with for no other reason than familiarity, superiority and comfort" get-your-act-together approach. Too many people hang around what I call "the easy crowd" - around them it's easy to fit in, easy to live up to what few expectations they have and easy to look like a mountain in the midst of such level terrain. But as one inspired motivational speaker once said, "If you are the smartest person in your group, you need a new group." Truth is, in the game of life as in any other, if you want to improve your skills you've got to get out of the habit of playing people who make you look like Michael Jordan and start hanging around people who can take your ass to the cleaners on a regular basis. Because only the people who are already there have the ability to help you move up into the next tier.
Posted at 11:18 am by sonipitts
Permalink |
Tuesday, July 05, 2005
If moral behavior were simply following rules, we could program a computer to be moral. -- Samuel P. Ginder, US navy captain
Posted at 04:18 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
Monday, July 04, 2005
Ed Cone, of the News-Record, writes about the Declaration of Independence and includes this little gem of insight - The first two enumerated rights, life and liberty, are straightforward enough, but this business about the pursuit of Happiness is more complex. Note that it is a right to the pursuit of Happiness, not to Happiness itself, and that despite the messages of our consumer culture, Happiness is not always the same thing as Fun. And nothing makes some people unHappier than the prospect of other people being Happy in a way that does not suit them. Yet this right to a personal definition of Happiness, and the right to pursue it, remains at the core of what Americans want their country to be. It is the Declaration's most profound idea. This brings to mind H. L. Menken's famous quote, "Fundamentalism: the terrible, pervasive fear that someone, somewhere, is having fun." In a country that is increasingly becoming polarized by religious partisans who seem to be heading us down a road that ends dangerously close to a Judeo-Christian version of sharia, we might do well to remember that our founding fathers wisely believed that the freedom of each to pursue happiness on their own terms was the foundation of freedom, not the slippery road to anarchy.
Posted at 08:33 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
Thursday, June 30, 2005
From Coaching Toys - Sparkers, Creative Ideas and Exercises, comes this little gem of an excerpt: Sabbath time can be a revolutionary challenge to the violence of overwork, mindless accumulation, and the endless multiplication of desires, responsibilities and accomplishments. Sabbath is a way of being in time where we remember who we are, remember what we know, and taste the gifts of spirit and eternity. -- Wayne Muller: Sabbath: Finding Rest, Renewal and Delight in Our Busy Lives
So, how about it - ready to shuck off the overdemanding, overhyped and overrated Puritan work ethic that has only served to put bellows to the fire of modern progress run amok? I know I am, which is why if you see anything posted here on a Saturday, you know something's seriously awry, like my sense of self-importance in thinking the world can't make do without me for 24 hours. Hell, I don't even turn on the computer or answer the phone unless it's an emergency. (I think I heard someone choking - I hope they're okay. I know the prospect of day sans connectivity is enough to strike terror into the hearts of the weak, the young and the heavily stock-invested.) No, for me Saturday is Sabboth day (no religious significance to the day chosen - it was merely the most convenient) - no work, no worrying about work, no email or surfing, no responsibilities beyond basic life support (I do brush my teeth, but that's about the extent of it), and no pressure to be doing any particular thing. For 24 hours. Straight. Damn near killed me the first few months. But I'm an old hand, now, so much so that it's beginning to bleed over into my Sundays, although I usually do manage to rouse myself enough to work on a few home-type projects just for the sake of slowing the process of merging from restful and regenerative repose to succumbing to sloth. Here lately, my weekends are being spent staying with Mom out in the wilds of Southeastern Missouri, and she doesn't even have a phone, let alone a tv or a computer. Nothing but me, the cats, the birds and Mom (she's usually wandering from one room to another trying to remember why she went in there). It's like the Gobi desert of social connectivity. And it works wonders, let me tell you. It's amazing how humbling it is to spend an entire weekend away from work and people and all that jazz, only to find that no one missed you but the friendly gang down at Nigerian Lotto Scams, Inc. And maybe that's why most of us don't. Maybe we keep working just so we can maintain the illusion of indispensability. I'm busy, therefore I must be needed, because if I wasn't needed, I wouldn't be so busy. To realize that you can disappear off the face of the planet all weekend without creating so much as a ripple in the fabric of social space-time is a hard pill to swallow. To risk discovering that things might actually work better when you're not there is even worse. So what are you afraid of? What are you running from when you hurry from one appointment to the next, and what are you avoiding by double booking your kid's playdate with a bi-coastal teleconference? There's one sure fire way to find out - spend 24-48 hours without so much as ooking at your phone, your computer or your television and you won't have to go soul-searching to see what fragile illusion you're depending on for your social identity. It'll get right up into your face and serve you notice. Are you ready to rumble?
Posted at 09:46 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
Just a hand-puppet for God
Working with a client today on issues regarding recharging, taking time out for yourself and so on, and this little gem popped out of my mouth fully formed: Teaching others isn't just sharing knowledge - the knowledge you share is merely a tool that allows your students to recreate for themselves the inspiration that you provide by being who you are.
I've got a good idea where this stuff comes from, and it ain't my humble little cranium space. Sometimes I stand in sheer awe of the stuff that comes out of my mouth when I'm in that flow state (although hearing it promptly de-flows me as I scramble for a pen to get it down while I can remember it). All I can do is hope that Insh'allah, it'll keep coming. (Heh - that little prayer ought to register a ping ECHELON - I do like keep our intel folks on their toes.) Thank you, I'll be here all week. Tip your waitresses and have a great night!
Posted at 06:40 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
Class consciousness and the dangerous myth of the self-made man
Writing for In These Times, David Moberg explores the dichotomy between the American belief that class isn't determinative, that social mobility is alive and well and that the rich get rich by virtue of their own hard work, determination and inate talent and not as a result of birth, status or luck. The myth, or belief, that people are solely what they make of themselves is useful to keep in mind while reading two ongoing series: the New York Times' on class and the Wall Street Journal's on social mobility. Both focus attention on a truth about American society that runs counter to most people's deep-seated beliefs: There is less social mobility in the United States now than in the '80s (and less then than in the '70s) and less mobility than in many other industrial countries, including Canada, Finland, Sweden and Germany. Yet 40 percent of respondents to a Times poll said that there was a greater chance to move up from one class to another now than 30 years ago, and 46 percent said it was easier to do so in the United States than in Europe.
...It becomes clear, as the Times series is titled, that "class matters," just as race, gender and other accidents of history matter. The social class into which someone is born largely defines one's class as an adult, and both make a difference in how healthy or how long-lived the person will be, especially in the absence of universal health insurance. It influences access to education and to jobs.
The myth of the self-made person, however, encourages the person who succeeds to think his good fortune is due entirely to his work and genius. For this reason businessmen in the United States have historically been more anti-union and hostile to government than their counterparts in Europe. And the myth makes those who fail blame themselves.
Although I am a staunch believer in many aspect of the self-made condition, I do so under no illusions about how that reality is affected by class awareness, social mobility and the restrictions and problems created by the nature of one's birth class. That's why I do the work I do - not only do I provide people with the normals tools and resources to try and climb out of their current situation into something new, I do a lot of work in showing others that such a thing is even possible and helping them find ways to do it. Of course, as with all things, my own class and the options that gives me (and hides from me) play there own part in my ability to help others and it has been a bona fide slog to try and fight my way clear of a lot of the unsaid, understood and subconscious tethers that are doing their level best to keep me where I started. This is a good thing, though. I can only teach what I know from my own experience, so every roadblock, glass ceiling and blind spot I come up against and confront simply provides me with that much more perspective to work with. This much is true - the American Dream, such as it was, is dead and has been for decades. The problem is that, just like a cheesy Hollywood slapstick plot, Americans have become so enamored and/or dependent on its existence that they've taken to dragging the stinking corpse of it around with them, dressed up with bright clothes and sprayed down with bathroom deodorizer to mask the stench of its mouldering miasma. Folks, let it go - you can't deal with what is unless and until you're willing to acknowledge what is no more. Luck, birth, class, societal behavior and other factors do play a role in how successful you are likely to be, regardless of your own intrinsic worth, skill and effort. This is fact. What is also fact is that a society who cherishes the success of its citizens needs to understand that working together, rather than competing with one another, is the only way to ensure a steady crop of such prosperous members. No man is an island. True self-made status is a myth, a subset of the Bread and Circuses part of our free gift with purchase for buying into the pyramid scheme of the American Dream - realistically, our efforts in the current societal set-up more often serve to make the rich richer without advancing our own cause. As Moberg writes in his article... Great social disparity means that the financially well-off use their money and greater political leverage to protect their privilege rather than to design policies for the common good.
...the very rich accumulate their wealth not simply because of what they did but because of the society in which they lived, and they have a debt to that society. And the heirs of such wealth are the antithesis of self-made men.
This self-interested behavior means that those struggling to come up from below have fewer and fewer infrastructural benefits, support and options to work with. Like European-decendent Americans trying to cap immigration levels so that other "self starters" can't have access to the same opportunities that created their own family's wealth, those at the top of the heap are doing their level best to prevent others from joining them, all the while trumpeting the facade of their own self-made status ( And it can be yours, too, for just a few low, low payments!) to motivate their employees to maintain and increase the value of the holdings that keep them in power. Unless we radically change the way our society views and handles success, prosperity and wealth, it is my firm belief that the American Dream will quickly morphing into a nightmare from which we will not be able to awaken. Sweet dreams.
Posted at 04:51 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Here is the follow up piece to Monday's post on balancing work and leisure. In it, success guru Michael Masterson talks about trading in his "I've scheduled 15 minutes for fun Thurday after next between 4 and 5" kind of life tfor a "If it ain't fun, I ain't doing it" alternative. So, how does he plan to do that and still maintain that cutting edge, multi-millionaire success guru level of existence? Check out his "life is for fun" plan for yourself. (Scroll down to the "Today's Message" segment.)
Posted at 05:19 pm by sonipitts
Permalink |
|